| David's profileDavid Moisan's ITPhotosBlogLists | Help |
|
David Moisan's ITIT Director for Salem Access TV, Salem, Mass. USA November 14 I Has An Office!To translate from LOLSpeak, I have an office! Last time I posted, the engineering room was being split off so my servers would be in a place of their own, cutting down on the noise level for staffers who have to check out and maintain equipment in the space.
My cable snake can be seen along the left. The cart is relatively empty because: I’ve found space for nearly everything: cables, software disks, small parts. To the left is the existing network rack—I still have to dress the cables—and the new snake underneath it. The door is a compromise. We had always thought of a pocket door for this space. Unfortunately, the lock options for these doors are limited. I and Sal had wanted something like a Simplex lock, widely used in IT (the city had one like it when I temped for them 20 years ago.) Deadbolts don’t work in a pocket door. Leo found a privacy lock which is very nice—the lock bolt has a small handle that you use to shut it. This is behind a deadbolted door, anyway (the entrance to Engineering which is behind the photographer.) We will probably get a few IP cams in here and around the building; it’s inevitable. My co-worker could not resist this portrait to finish it off! November 13 Don’t Change My Resolution!Raymond Chen (The Old New Thing) posted recently about how people arrange their workplace, or in this case, their kitchen, but are confused by well-meaning people that want to fix their place the “right” way:
Someone in the comments made a great point:
I. WOULD. BE. LIVID! if that were my computer. At home, I have a 23” Dell display that can do 2048x1152. I cannot use that resolution at all. I can do 1920x1080 but it is very uncomfortable to read. It’s set to 1440x900, and my DPI is 125%. That’s the best compromise I could come up with. I’m aware that Windows 7 can support higher DPI. When I first installed Windows 7 I did some experimentation. I could have gone with 1920x1080; it is a reasonable minimum for this size display. I tested that resolution at 150% DPI But I had trouble with third-party apps. In the screen clip above, there are two Windows gadgets. One is native to Windows, the clock. The other is a third party weather application. The clock scales correctly at high DPI. The weather application does not. At 125% you can see the difference, but at 150% it is much more pronounced. I calculated that for me to use the native display resolution (2048x1152), I might have needed 175%. That would break quite a few apps and make that weather app unusable (I prefer it to the Microsoft weather gadget for its radar display and severe weather notifications.) (I’ve found, too, that I get odd-looking results when I use “odd” DPI values. Internet Explorer will let you have a custom DPI, but it has regular values, 125%, 150%, that it will prefer to use. So my IE is set to 125% or 150% depending on the machine I’m using.) Aren’t higher resolutions technically better? Not necessarily. Most modern mid-range displays have a very good scan converter built in. I’ve only used one monitor that was really bad at that, and that was a cheap monitor I picked for a server room that I don’t use every day. It’s nasty, but not bad enough for the use I give it to warrant replacing it. More to the point, I don’t notice it. It might not even be possible for most users to determine the difference. There are physical limitations on the resolution that someone with normal vision can perceive, and they mean that for the small displays most of us are using, we will never be able to notice the difference between, say, 720p or 1080p on HDTV. With the current state of the art, this is probably the best I can do. Will it change? Absolutely! Is it annoying to run at a lower resolution? Certainly, sometimes. But for me and others with vision problems this is the best we can do. Don’t change my resolution! November 09 Missing Search Provider Icons in Internet ExplorerI saw this problem recently: I, like most IE 8 users, use multiple search providers in IE, all of them with their icons that appear when selected. The search provider icons for several providers, including Bing, my default, were missing and showed only the generic magnifying glass icon. Restarting IE didn’t help nor did rebooting. I found a simple workaround to fix this but I first want to explain search provider internals in some detail. In Internet Explorer, a search provider is an XML document with a a specially-coded URL based on the OpenSearch specification. IE comes with Bing as its default search provider; users can add more providers. In the screenshot, you can see I have Bing, which is defaulted, Google, Wikipedia and WolframAlpha as my providers. Providers are stored in the user’s registry under HKU:\<user SID>\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer. Each Search Provider is listed under a GUID; DefaultScope is a string value with the default provider listed. It points to Bing’s entry in this case: Most of the values are self-explanatory. Of particular interest in my problem is the FaviconPath and FaviconURL string values. Let’s say the Bing icon is missing. Its path is C:\Users\davidmoisan\AppData\LocalLow\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Services\search_{533B8DE4-C0F4-4C0F-ABA8-79A79086865C}.ico. Here are all my search icons. They are in c:\users\<userprofile>\AppData\LocalLow\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Services\: Note the filenames are of the form search_{GUID}.ico. With that in mind, I fixed my problem the hard way: I found an Bing icon elsewhere on my system, copied it to this directory, renamed it to match the filename in FaviconPath and restarted IE. It worked! (This explains why there are multiple instances of a few icons in the screenshot above. You will normally have just one icon per each provider, but the extra icons aren’t hurting anything.) However, a much easier solution that I recommend for regular users:
This problem may also be caused by a recent security update, KB974455, and its later update KB976749, which was released to Microsoft Update last week. I first noticed this problem after applying the latter update, but I can’t confirm that either update caused this. If you do install the updates, install 974455 first before installing 976749; installing 976749 without the former update may cause IE to stop working. In my case both updates were already on the machine in the correct order. I might never know how the icons disappeared but now we know how to make them reappear. Happy searching! October 29 Save Vista!So, Windows 7 is out and has been for a week. I’ve been running it for exactly two months today. I like it and I’m encouraged by the Windows development process, something that can’t be said for Ubuntu. (It doesn’t help that its latest release has problems with recognizing multiple SATA drives.) I’ve had no problems that I could attribute to Windows 7 specifically; I did have Windows bluescreen on log off, but that appears to be due to the UltraVNC server I had running. (My HDTV antenna, and the TV card that it feeds are in different rooms, so I use a Windows Mobile PDA with a VNC client to adjust it by viewing the signal strength app through the desktop.) The bug code I got (Bug Check 0xEC: SESSION_HAS_VALID_SPECIAL_POOL_ON_EXIT), is very specific as to the cause—any driver related to win32k.sys, atmfd.dll or rdpdd.dll, in other words any remote access hooking DLL such as VNC’s. No new version of UltraVNC has come out so I’ve gone on with my life. It has been otherwise very uneventful over the past few months. The one thing I should have learned over 3 years of using Vista, is how the IT press used the “Vista Failure” meme to keep itself going. If you got a Vista machine this past spring, like one of my friends did, you’re probably doing OK. It’s a good thing for the IT press that people have reported boot loops when installing Windows 7. I just wish, in my universe, pundits like Randall Kennedy and Loyd Case would sweep streets while the likes of Mark Russinovich do reporting. If Mark were reporting on this, it’d be fixed! Good for the pundits, “Seven S****!”, not so good for the people affected. |
|
||
|
|